Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NHS Apps Library
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 14:45, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- NHS Apps Library (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This was a "library" (essentially a branding excercise) which existed online for a few years and subsequently closed. All the sources cited are primary and very little third-party sources available on search. Overall I do not think this meets threshold of notability. Elshad (talk) 12:22, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Health and fitness and United Kingdom. Elshad (talk) 12:22, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Medicine and Websites. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 21:01, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.